Ir al contenido principal

Goodbye Bafana film review



1.- In general, what did you like and dislike about the film?
I didn’t like the film so much. Not to say that I didn’t enjoy it, but I wouldn’t say it is the best by any chance. Maybe, the thing that I liked the most was the African culture representation through the few stick fights and the use of xhusa language.
The movie tries to show a side of the society during the apartheid struggle, the whites who were against white supremacy, and uses Gregory as his symbol. However, isn’t shown to be fighting or something, if anything, he was helping the government by giving them information.
That’s the point I disliked the most about this film. They had a point of view that isn’t considered at all, but they wasted it and instead fell into making a mediocre Hollywood movie that, if it wasn’t for the controversy surrounding it, would be forgotten.  
2.- Who was the character you liked the most and the character you liked the least in the film? Why?
I can't say that I liked any character are all. Most of them are really one-dimensional and those who aren't are not particullary likeble. Maybe the one that surprised me the most was Gregory’s wife. She isn’t a very important character, but its shown to have at least a little bit of development, especially when you compare her speech to her daughter about apartheid, saying that it was god's plan to separate good from evil, to the end of the film when she showed interest in meeting Nelson Mandela.
The characters I disliked the most are Winnie Mandela and Gregory. Winnie because of her little participation,  and Gregory because he wasn't an "active" so to speak protagonist. I'll explain this later on the review.
3.- How do the versions of James Gregory, Nelson Mandela, and Winnie Mandela compare between Goodbye Bafana and Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom?
Because of the different perspective in both films, the versions of Nelson and Winnie Mandela in "Goodbye Bafana" aren’t as deep as they are in "Long Walk to Freedom". Nelson is shown as a revolutionary at first, many times exposing his will to do everything to get equality.  However, later he takes the role of sort of a mentor and a friend to Gregory, giving him some advice on life. Winnie, in the other hand, is only shown as the wife of Nelson and not as her own person. This really contrasts with the other film, where she is a central part of the struggle, totally independent from the ANC.
Gregory here is the main character, meaning that his part on the movie is way bigger than it was in "Long Walk to Freedom". But Joseph Fiennes performance is bland, and it didn`t allow me to like the character at all. During most of the film he does nothing besides what his superiors tell him to do, and when he does something, it is not really relevant or ends up getting him in troubles. With that being said, the movie keeps trying to make us think that he was really, really important to the government, sort of a mediator between them and Mandela. At the end of the day, he is not more than a puppet to the system, who feels like he can so something to change it but ends up doing nothing.

Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

Rockers Film Review

1. How does Leroy "Horsemouth" Wallace from  Rockers  compare to Ivan Martin fro m The Harder They Come ? The comparison between Ivan Martin and Leroy Wallace is very interesting, mainly because they are two sides of the same coin. Both represent the working jamaican man, however, the both had different ways to get what they wanted. For Iva,n the most important thing was getting what he wanted, no  matter the way he did it. If he had to steal or kill, he'd do it. Leroy, in the other hand, tried to do things the right way, and when he discovered what was going on with the mafia, he didn't doubt about ending it for the sake of his people. If I had to make a moral comparison between those two, I'd say that Leroy was a hero while Ivan was a villain or an anti-hero, and as I said before, it can be seen in their actions even though they represent the same class of people. 2. What is your favorite scene from the film? Why? I can't say I liked a lot of the scen...

Catch a fire film review

1.      In general, what did you like and dislike about the film? I really enjoyed the film, especially the first middle part of it. Watching a film about a normal black citizen and his own struggles in the apartheid society is something you don’t get to see, mainly because producers may think that a movie about revolutionaries can be way more interesting. However, Catch a fire does it – and pretty well actually. Patrick Chamuso was an apolitical citizen, who didn’t care to change the world as long as he could live his live quietly. He was a school soccer teacher, had a family (although he cheated his wife) and did his job as good as he could. However, after he was tortured everything changed for him. He didn’t wanted his family to have the same problem, so he decided to change it and become a revolutionary. I didn’t enjoyed too much the second part of the film. I see that it shows the things the way they were, and I admire the movie director Phillip Noyce for ...