Ir al contenido principal

Catch a fire film review


1.     In general, what did you like and dislike about the film?
I really enjoyed the film, especially the first middle part of it. Watching a film about a normal black citizen and his own struggles in the apartheid society is something you don’t get to see, mainly because producers may think that a movie about revolutionaries can be way more interesting. However, Catch a fire does it – and pretty well actually. Patrick Chamuso was an apolitical citizen, who didn’t care to change the world as long as he could live his live quietly. He was a school soccer teacher, had a family (although he cheated his wife) and did his job as good as he could. However, after he was tortured everything changed for him. He didn’t wanted his family to have the same problem, so he decided to change it and become a revolutionary.
I didn’t enjoyed too much the second part of the film. I see that it shows the things the way they were, and I admire the movie director Phillip Noyce for that. However, the war movies doesn’t really appeal to me, and that’s what I see that it became. However, I still think this is the best apartheid film I’ve seen so far.
2.     Who was the character you like the most and the character you liked the least in the film? Why?
I really liked Patrick’s character. He was very well written, and one can really connect with him in a way, as he was a normal man. His development from an apolitical citizen to a revolutionary is clear, and you can really tell why it happened. He was very brave too, willing to give his live for the freedom of Africa, and more importantly, of his daughters.
A character I hated was Patrick’s captor, Nic Vos. He was simply a terrible person. He lied, pretending to be accepting Patrick in his place at some point, but he actually enjoyed torturing him.
3.     What was the role of Samora Machel, the FRELIMO, and revolutionary Mozambique in the struggle against the South African apartheid? Use examples from the film and the biography of Samora Machel
The FRELIMO, just like many revolutionary movements at the time, was trying to get the freedom of his nation. This means that they are in a similar position with South Africa’s movements like the ANC. They helped them in the way they could, and, in the movie, it can be seen in the military training FRELIMO would let them make in Mozambique. Machel, who was the leader of the movement after the passing of its founder, was trying to get Mozambique to be free, and helped South Africa giving them a safe (or at least, safer) place to train.

Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

Goodbye Bafana film review

1.- In general, what did you like and dislike about the film? I didn’t like the film so much. Not to say that I didn’t enjoy it, but I wouldn’t say it is the best by any chance. Maybe, the thing that I liked the most was the African culture representation through the few stick fights and the use of xhusa language. The movie tries to show a side of the society during the apartheid struggle, the whites who were against white supremacy, and uses Gregory as his symbol. However, isn’t shown to be fighting or something, if anything, he was helping the government by giving them information. That’s the point I disliked the most about this film. They had a point of view that isn’t considered at all, but they wasted it and instead fell into making a mediocre Hollywood movie that, if it wasn’t for the controversy surrounding it, would be forgotten.   2.- Who was the character you liked the most and the character you liked the least in the film? Why? I can't say that I liked an...

Rockers Film Review

1. How does Leroy "Horsemouth" Wallace from  Rockers  compare to Ivan Martin fro m The Harder They Come ? The comparison between Ivan Martin and Leroy Wallace is very interesting, mainly because they are two sides of the same coin. Both represent the working jamaican man, however, the both had different ways to get what they wanted. For Iva,n the most important thing was getting what he wanted, no  matter the way he did it. If he had to steal or kill, he'd do it. Leroy, in the other hand, tried to do things the right way, and when he discovered what was going on with the mafia, he didn't doubt about ending it for the sake of his people. If I had to make a moral comparison between those two, I'd say that Leroy was a hero while Ivan was a villain or an anti-hero, and as I said before, it can be seen in their actions even though they represent the same class of people. 2. What is your favorite scene from the film? Why? I can't say I liked a lot of the scen...