Ir al contenido principal

Mandela: Long walk to freedom review


1.- In general, what did you like and dislike about the film?
     This movie does a really good job as a Nelson Mandela biography, having a great focus on his role in the struggle for the elimination of the apartheid, his participation on the African National Congress (ANC) and his relationship with his wife, Winnie Mandela. The production value here is really good, everything from the actors and performances to the scenarios and photography has a great quality.
     Something I didn’t like about the film is the way that the relationships between Mandela and other characters are developed. For example, his friendship with his prison guard James Gregory is only implied, but never really shown or confirmed. The same can be said about many of his companions on the ANC. This can be because of the short duration of the movie, as the makers had to fit almost every part of Mandela's life in two hours and a half. The exception to this is his relationship with Winnie. Every interaction they have feels real.
2. In your own words, how would you compare the "various Mandelas;" the ones from the article and the one from the film?
     The movie shows mainly the “actual Mandela”, the revolutionary man with the conviction to do everything he needs to do in the battle against apartheid. He is shown this way in most of the film, during the beginning of the movement to his late years on Robben’s Island jail. It is towards the end that we get to see the “myth” Mandela, the wise, non-violent man who became president and “finished” oppression in South Africa.  I think this change was really abrupt, at one scene we see the revolutionary man and after a little cut he becomes the figure most known in the media. We can asume this change happened out of camera, as his experience in jail made him became a more acertive person.
3. What was the role that Winnie Mandela played in the film? Think about the contrast between her and the other ANC members.
     Winnie Mandela played a big role in this movie, maybe even bigger than Nelson’s one. She had a much more radical point of view of the problem than the ANC. She wanted to take the power and eliminate white supremacy through the use of weapons. The people of Africa really supported her ideas, after all, she was the key figure when Nelson was in jail. She had charisma, and her followers loved and trusted her.
     As I said earlier, there is a big contrast between the ANC point of view and hers. After she was imprisoned for over a year, she started to think that the only way for native Africans to stop apartheid and get to power was by the use of violence. Because of this, her ideas became the contrary of Nelson’s, which later lead to their separation.
     This character is the spotlight of the movie for me. She is a key figure in South Africa's history, and was treated with the respect she deserves in this adaptation of Mandela's life. 
4.- How do you compare the role of Nelson Mandela and the African National Congress in the struggle against the apartheid and in the post-apartheid South Africa to the Concertación and their role in the struggle against Augusto Pinochet's dictatorship and in post-dictatorial Chile?
     As Chileans we may relate in some way to the South African struggle. Both apartheid and the dictatorship were long periods of time where people’s rights were highly repressed, and both have consequences we can see to this day. These can be seen especially in an economic level, as Chile keeps having the model established in the dictatorship and South Africa is still struggling against poverty and the lack of employment.
     Another similarity between both conflicts is the way they entered the process of transition, both by democratic voting – Chile had the plebiscite and South Africa the election.
     A big difference I see between both cases it that there is not a real representative figure in the movement to get back to democracy in Chile. While South Africa had both Nelson and Winnie Mandela, Chilean’s movements were their own figure. However, we can compare South African’s leaders to Salvador Allende as inspirations for those who wanted a change.

Comentarios

  1. I liked the comparison at the end, the whole review is wonderful. Also your point with Gregory is a good observation that nobody notices at all.
    <2
    L o n g t r o u s e r s

    ResponderEliminar

Publicar un comentario

Entradas populares de este blog

Goodbye Bafana film review

1.- In general, what did you like and dislike about the film? I didn’t like the film so much. Not to say that I didn’t enjoy it, but I wouldn’t say it is the best by any chance. Maybe, the thing that I liked the most was the African culture representation through the few stick fights and the use of xhusa language. The movie tries to show a side of the society during the apartheid struggle, the whites who were against white supremacy, and uses Gregory as his symbol. However, isn’t shown to be fighting or something, if anything, he was helping the government by giving them information. That’s the point I disliked the most about this film. They had a point of view that isn’t considered at all, but they wasted it and instead fell into making a mediocre Hollywood movie that, if it wasn’t for the controversy surrounding it, would be forgotten.   2.- Who was the character you liked the most and the character you liked the least in the film? Why? I can't say that I liked an...

Rockers Film Review

1. How does Leroy "Horsemouth" Wallace from  Rockers  compare to Ivan Martin fro m The Harder They Come ? The comparison between Ivan Martin and Leroy Wallace is very interesting, mainly because they are two sides of the same coin. Both represent the working jamaican man, however, the both had different ways to get what they wanted. For Iva,n the most important thing was getting what he wanted, no  matter the way he did it. If he had to steal or kill, he'd do it. Leroy, in the other hand, tried to do things the right way, and when he discovered what was going on with the mafia, he didn't doubt about ending it for the sake of his people. If I had to make a moral comparison between those two, I'd say that Leroy was a hero while Ivan was a villain or an anti-hero, and as I said before, it can be seen in their actions even though they represent the same class of people. 2. What is your favorite scene from the film? Why? I can't say I liked a lot of the scen...

Catch a fire film review

1.      In general, what did you like and dislike about the film? I really enjoyed the film, especially the first middle part of it. Watching a film about a normal black citizen and his own struggles in the apartheid society is something you don’t get to see, mainly because producers may think that a movie about revolutionaries can be way more interesting. However, Catch a fire does it – and pretty well actually. Patrick Chamuso was an apolitical citizen, who didn’t care to change the world as long as he could live his live quietly. He was a school soccer teacher, had a family (although he cheated his wife) and did his job as good as he could. However, after he was tortured everything changed for him. He didn’t wanted his family to have the same problem, so he decided to change it and become a revolutionary. I didn’t enjoyed too much the second part of the film. I see that it shows the things the way they were, and I admire the movie director Phillip Noyce for ...